Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider these examples:

  They are everywhere.
  There is food everywhere.

I used sentences like these a lot but lately I realize that everywhere is an adverb. What about those grammar rules that say "using adjective with linking verb" ?

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Some “adverbials” can act as adjectives. Locatives in particular—expressions which designate a location in time or space—can modify a nominal as well as an “action”, and thus may be properly employed as the complement of a linking verb:

Elizabeth is on the left.
We are ahead of schedule.
The keys could be anywhere.

Traditional grammarians sometimes try to get around this awkward fact by claiming that these “adverbials” modify the linking verb; but this is clearly wrong, since a) this leaves the verb without a complement, and b) the same constituents can be employed in contexts where they clearly modify nominals:

The ball on the left is bigger than the ball on the right.
We’d be grateful if anybody ahead of schedule on their own project could lend a hand getting ours out the door.
Anybody anywhere can do this.

share|improve this answer

An adverb modifies a verb or an adjective.

You are correct that in sentences with a linking verb, the predicate modifier is usually an adjective. That is because the modifier is refering to the subject, which is a noun or pronoun.

However, in a few senteces using verb that may be considered linking, the predicate modifier is actually modifying the verb. In the exaples you give, everywhere modifies is and are.

They are [they exist]. Where are they [where do they exist]? Everywhere.

share|improve this answer

The rule "After to be follows an adjective" is simply formulated wrong.

  • What is he? -- He is a doctor. - to be + a noun
  • Where is he? -- He is in London/in hospital/at home/at work/ here - to be + where-indications (adverbials or adverbs)
  • He is new/old - to be +adjective

If you read texts carefully you will see that the rule "After to be follows an adjectve" is simply wrong.

You have to reformulate your rule: one of the sentence types with to be is to be + adjective. But there are also sentence types such as to be + noun or + adverbials/adverbs.

When you ask when was it the answers can be - That was after the war/ in1963/ on last Monday/recently/yesterday. Here you have when-indications after to be, and no adjectives.

share|improve this answer

If you clarify the question, it'll be better. What you want to know? If you firmly believe that an adverb should not be used after a linking verb, I'm afraid, this is incorrect.

I'm not aware of the rule that denies a linking verb not taking an adverb after it. The simplest example is...

She is here! Here, is is a linking verb and here is an adjective. It's simple and clear.

Yes, we have rules for adverbial positioning and I think it'll be helpful.

The adverbs of manner (how), place (where -this is your case), and time (when) generally go in end position.

There is food everywhere (-place).; She brushed her hair slowly (-manner).

Another thing, Swan's book describes that in such cases, here and there begins the sentences. So again,

Everywhere there's food There's food everywhere.

share|improve this answer
    
No, Maulik, I'm not asking about that rule. My question is why an adverb is used after a linking verb. The rule say it should be an adjective. –  user2747502 Apr 3 at 12:41
    
@user2747502 Ah, change the question title and describe in it. This mislead me :( –  Maulik V Apr 3 at 12:43

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.