Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Check these sentences with their context -

Today, you got an interview and the interviewers may ask about their company and some questions about the current affairs ~ Yes I know. Don't worry, I'll come prepared.
(A cop to another cop) There's some illegal activity going on in Dawn's Street and tonight, we have to fix that ~ Sure, sir! I'll come armed.

Now, is this possible that way?

We'll be back by evening but then remember, that place is very far and no food is available ~ Dont' worry, I'll come eaten.

"...come eaten" - possible this way? If not, how do I say it in that format without changing the sentence completely?

share|improve this question
    
You can say, "I'll come having eaten," or, "I'll come full," (or even, "I won't come hungry"). –  J.R. May 18 at 11:26
    
@J.R. But if I'll come dressed or armed is okay, why not I'll come eaten. We don't usually say I'll come having armed/dressed where to have is not eating but rather possession. –  Maulik V May 19 at 3:47
    
It's a quirk of the language, I guess. But remember, have is about so much more than possession. –  J.R. May 19 at 12:16

3 Answers 3

I'm going to snip the co-text, but I'm keeping it in mind.

I'll come armed

This means that the cop is going to be armed when he comes.

I'll come eaten

This means that I'm going to be eaten when I come.

Grammatically sound, but semantically nonsensical.

Generally you can only verb-of-motion past-tense when the past-tense describes an act that you will have been done to yourself (Or to the subject of the main clause.

For instance:

  • I will come dressed = I will come, having been dressed
  • I will come armed = I will come, having been armed
  • He will come groomed - He will come, having been groomed

... etc.

If you want to say that you have come, having eaten beforehand... well, that's probably the only way to say it:

  • I will come, having already eaten
share|improve this answer
    
remove myself and it'll go fine. I'll dress and come. I'll arm and come and so... I'll eat and come.* - what about that? –  Maulik V May 18 at 6:20
    
@MaulikV Well, that would work, but Codeswitcher has provided an unusual reading that people might have. –  jimsug May 18 at 6:46
1  
These sentences don't specify who did the dressing, arming, or grooming. In "I will come dressed", for example, the speaker could be dressed by a servant. In "I will come armed", someone else could have armed the speaker. It's true that most people dress themselves, so it's a reasonable guess, but the sentence doesn't specify one way or the other. In "I'll come eaten", the guess is perhaps less reasonable. –  snailplane May 18 at 18:54
    
Yeah,true. It's actually passivisation, isn't it? –  jimsug May 18 at 21:53

I will come fed conveys the meaning you intend and would be understood by native speakers. However in British English it isn't common usage except for comic effect.

share|improve this answer

Important point 1:

If one says, "I will come prepared," who is the object of "prepared"? "I" am "prepared".

If one says, "I will come armed," who is the object of "armed"? "I" am "armed".

Thus if one says, "I will come eaten," who is the object of "eaten"? "I" am "eaten".

Thus literally, "I will come eaten" does not mean "I will have ate (something)", it means "(something) ate me".

Important point 2:

The passive "to be eaten" is extremely vulgar slang for a sexual act involving a mouth. The verb "come" is also vulgar slang. The sentence "I will come eaten" is a perfectly valid, intelligible English sentence that means something radically other than what you intend and you must never, ever use it in polite company.

share|improve this answer
1  
I didn't even consider this reading, and would be very surprised if anyone I spoke to thought of it. But yes, perhaps best to play it safe. –  jimsug May 18 at 6:48
    
In that sense... I'll come prepared - who has prepared? 'you' have (the *subject); Likewise, who has armed? 'you' have; who has eaten? 'you' have. In your all examples, the object is served as a noun to be. 'You' being prepared; 'you' being armed'; 'you' being eaten. -which is not true. –  Maulik V May 18 at 8:55
    
@MaulikV: Nope. –  Codeswitcher May 19 at 3:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.