English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

However, ♦ when the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011 retains the power to relocate individuals to another part of the country without consent under powers for the secretary of state to impose enhanced TPIM notices. ♦ This, essentially emergency power may only be used, when Parliament is not in session, i.e. between the dissolution of a Parliament and the fi rst Queen’s Speech of the next Parliament.

Source: p 72, The English Legal System 2012-2013, Gary Slapper

Are there problems with the subordinate clause that I've surrounded with lozenges (♦)?

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

There is indeed a problem. This is as you say a subordinate clause—specifically, a temporal clause headed by when—and there is no head clause to which it is subordinated.

I think this is probably an editing mistake: when is likely left over from an earlier draft and should be deleted.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.