English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have read some news that some patient who suffered from some kind of cancer have to undergo some surgery. Usually, the doctor would remove the infected organ from the patient's body.

Is it correct if I replaced the word in sentence 1, remove with amputate this way (sentence 2)?

  1. The patient's infected organ was removed.
  2. The patient's infected organ was amputated.
share|improve this question
In colloquial speech, we say things like "She had her gallbladder out." – TRomano Mar 5 at 17:18
The medical term is the suffix -ectomy, but you can only use that with the medical name for the organ, e,g, "The patient had a mastectomy", "hysterectomy", etc. – alephzero Mar 5 at 18:51
Sometimes people will use "amputate" figuratively, to mean "remove with unusual violence," in situations other than medicine. This is not a standard usage, so be aware that if you see it written somewhere, the word is being used poetically and not literally. – Crashworks Mar 6 at 5:31
up vote 15 down vote accepted

To amputate refers to extremities and limbs, not internal organs. So I would say the second sentence is incorrect. Instead of amputate you could use removed, that would work just fine and would sound better in my opinion.

share|improve this answer
Thank you Jacob. – kitty Mar 5 at 14:26
More so than usually, I would say it always does. – Azor-Ahai Mar 6 at 1:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.