Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://ell.stackexchange.com/ with https://ell.stackexchange.com/
Nov 19, 2016 at 0:55 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Oct 19, 2016 at 20:40 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Sep 19, 2016 at 18:38 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Aug 20, 2016 at 16:55 comment added Kinzle B @all, re-edited! Hope this makes it clearer.
Aug 20, 2016 at 16:52 history edited Kinzle B CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1051 characters in body; edited title
Aug 18, 2016 at 14:42 answer added LawrenceC timeline score: 1
Aug 18, 2016 at 11:57 history edited Kinzle B CC BY-SA 3.0
added 272 characters in body
Aug 18, 2016 at 11:38 history edited Kinzle B CC BY-SA 3.0
added 377 characters in body
Aug 18, 2016 at 10:56 history edited Kinzle B CC BY-SA 3.0
added 124 characters in body
Aug 18, 2016 at 10:43 history edited Kinzle B CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 150 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Aug 17, 2016 at 21:58 comment added P. E. Dant Reinstate Monica @KinzleB I agree that 'Would have known' vs 'could have known' is an interesting question and that it has generated much discussion, but I confess that I don't know what your question is. Can you add a sentence that begins with: "What I would like to know is...", or is the the question too complex to be distilled?
Aug 17, 2016 at 17:35 comment added FumbleFingers But how you can have imagined this misconception, and, more strange still, how you can have known our private conversation, astonishes me. I don't see anything inherently ungrammatical about that, and it's certainly true the negated form is common as muck. I think these grammarians are getting carried away with explaining idiomatic preference as "rules"
Aug 17, 2016 at 17:31 comment added BillJ I realise that, but I wouldn't go along with it being a free relative. I'd say the how clause is a subordinate interrogative clause; the meaning is "I don't know the answer to the question 'How could the killer have known the key code?"'
Aug 17, 2016 at 17:30 comment added Kinzle B grammar.about.com/od/fh/g/Free-Relative-Clause.htm It's how the killer could have known the key code that is the free relative clause, not the whole sentence! @BillJ
Aug 17, 2016 at 17:25 comment added BillJ What makes you think that I don’t know how the killer could have known the key code is a 'free' relative clause?
Aug 17, 2016 at 17:05 history asked Kinzle B CC BY-SA 3.0