Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackEnglishLL/status/775751437703864320
edited title
Link
Alan Carmack
  • 12k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 52

Does "at the same time" refer only to physicalchronological time and never to logical sequence?

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Serguei
  • 1.4k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 27

Can one say, for example, "The publisher did not restrict himself to classics. He did publish Shakespeare, but, at the same time, a few years later he published Christie too"

Can one say, for example, "The publisher did not restrict himself to classics. He did publish Shakespeare, but at the same time a few years later he published Christie too"

Can one say, for example, "The publisher did not restrict himself to classics. He did publish Shakespeare, but, at the same time, a few years later he published Christie too"

added 3 characters in body
Source Link
Serguei
  • 1.4k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 27

Can one say, for example, "The publisher did not restrict himself to classics. He did publish Shakespeare, but at the same time 20a few years later he published Christie too"

Can one say, for example, "The publisher did not restrict himself to classics. He did publish Shakespeare, but at the same time 20 years later he published Christie too"

Can one say, for example, "The publisher did not restrict himself to classics. He did publish Shakespeare, but at the same time a few years later he published Christie too"

Source Link
Serguei
  • 1.4k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 27
Loading