Timeline for How to refer to a label?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2016 at 18:23 | answer | added | Torsten | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 27, 2016 at 17:40 | comment | added | Ahmad | @FumbleFingers I have a rule like if conditions then assignments, extraction command. assignments are divided to pre- and post-assignments. It is a declarative rule. An extraction function uses such rules for the real extraction and do it int the order you mentioned. It uses the extraction command part for doing the extraction. | |
| Oct 27, 2016 at 17:21 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | In which case there seems to be some confusion about "the naming of the parts" here. You seem to have a "command" which for argument's sake we could represent as the function call extract(parameter_list). When that "command / function" is executed / called, it performs the subfunctions pre-assign, extract, post-assign in sequence. You seem to be saying extraction is both the whole sequence of actions and one of those actions in particular. As I said, I don't fully understand, but perhaps it would make more sense to refer to the extraction part alongside pre/post assignment parts. | |
| Oct 27, 2016 at 17:09 | comment | added | Ahmad | @FumbleFingers yes, the extraction you point is done according to a command (extraction command) specified in the rule. | |
| Oct 27, 2016 at 16:42 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | Is there really an "extraction command" as such? - I don't fully understand the context, but it seems to me pre-assignment -> extraction -> post-assignment are three "subfunctions" always performed consecutively in response to some "data retrieval" command. But yes, you can use extraction command, pre-assignment, post-assignment exactly the same as you would use command, assignment. | |
| Oct 27, 2016 at 16:11 | history | asked | Ahmad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |