Timeline for The order of events when using past perfect
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2013 at 14:34 | comment | added | StoneyB on hiatus | @jess, sure. You don't really need any perfect at all; see FumbleFingers' Perfect Truism | |
| Oct 4, 2013 at 14:20 | comment | added | jess | Then would you say that this makes sense as well in terms of logical chronological order? "...which she forwarded to other members." Would it still make sense if I just use simple past without "then"? | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 20:50 | vote | accept | jess | ||
| Oct 3, 2013 at 20:50 | |||||
| Oct 3, 2013 at 17:50 | comment | added | StoneyB on hiatus | @WendiKidd Actually, this is how the language geeks are using it. | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 17:44 | comment | added | WendiKidd | Interesting new word you've taught me! I was at first wondering how it differed from implication, but these definitions sorted that out for me and gave me some food for thought. +1 just for that, not that the answer itself doesn't deserve it anyway! | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 15:33 | history | edited | StoneyB on hiatus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 3, 2013 at 14:41 | history | answered | StoneyB on hiatus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |