Timeline for "No hurries. No worries" - could we say "No hurries nor worries"?

7 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Dec 5, 2016 at 9:46	vote	accept	fedorqui
Dec 5, 2016 at 4:30	history	edited	Jasper		edited tags
Dec 4, 2016 at 18:32	comment	added	StoneyB on hiatus		In the context of just four words, the notion of "a single sentence" is pretty meaningless: whether you point with a period or a comma is more about indicating rhythm and prosody than about syntax.
Dec 4, 2016 at 18:30	answer	added	StoneyB on hiatus		timeline score: 4
Dec 4, 2016 at 17:30	comment	added	fedorqui		@stangdon oh, thanks! First of all, I thought it was no hurries, so thanks for that. Secondly, is there any way to "merge" both no hurry and no worries in a single sentence into something idiomatic?
Dec 4, 2016 at 17:25	comment	added	stangdon		It's grammatically correct as far as it goes, but it's so un-idiomatic that it looks very strange. The phrase is usually "no hurry", singular, because it's short for "there is no hurry", singular, because you are only in one hurry at a time. But you could have more than one worry at a time! In any case, it sounds non-fluent and non-idiomatic to use them together with "nor".
Dec 4, 2016 at 17:11	history	asked	fedorqui	CC BY-SA 3.0