I was reading one article and could not understand the following part in bold. Tha article is basically about the BCCI refusing to take the recommendations of supreme court and so have to pay the price of defiance.
It was therefore inevitable that the court would seek to send out a message that it will not brook any wilful defiance. Despite the court making the Lodha panel reforms binding on the BCCI through its July 18 verdict, the BCCI appeared to defy it
It was therefore inevitable that the court would seek to send out a message that it will not brook any wilful defiance. Despite the court making the Lodha panel reforms binding on the BCCI through its July 18 verdict, the BCCI appeared to defy it.
My questions are
For 1st part, does it say that the court will not let any kind of disobey to its recommendations happen?
What binding is thw author talking about? Also, how did the BCCI defy it?
I read the article from the following link: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/The-price-of-defiance/article16979003.ece
