Timeline for This many vs these many
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 4, 2018 at 18:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackEnglishLL/status/1047909570159493120 | ||
Oct 4, 2018 at 10:09 | answer | added | GJC | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 10, 2017 at 19:35 | answer | added | Jude | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 14, 2017 at 15:39 | vote | accept | jitendragarg | ||
S Jan 6, 2017 at 5:25 | history | suggested | EngFan |
word-difference and not word meaning
|
|
Jan 6, 2017 at 4:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 6, 2017 at 5:25 | |||||
Jan 6, 2017 at 4:09 | history | edited | jitendragarg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
Jan 6, 2017 at 4:09 | comment | added | jitendragarg | @Cascabel I checked EnglishForums.com and other results on google. I mentioned the same here. 'As per other forums, "this many" works when talking about specific number. But I don't see any example of the same. If I have specific number, then use of "many" is not even justified.' | |
Jan 5, 2017 at 1:10 | history | migrated | from english.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
Jan 5, 2017 at 0:34 | answer | added | Zack | timeline score: 7 | |
Jan 4, 2017 at 21:18 | comment | added | Jim | I probably would have said that many... | |
Jan 4, 2017 at 19:37 | comment | added | Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ | And this is an ngram view of the usages compared. | |
Jan 4, 2017 at 19:20 | history | asked | jitendragarg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |