Skip to main content
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Kman3
  • 2.8k
  • 11
  • 14

You mustshould use the auxiliary verb did, emphasizing the general action of sleepwalking.

You wouldn't know if you sleepwalk.

You wouldn't know if you did [sleepwalk].

Had is the past perfect, and requires the past participle sleepwalked. If Speaker A was referring to a past event of sleepwalking rather than sleepwalking itself, this would be better.

I didn't sleepwalk.

You wouldn't know if you had [sleepwalked].

You must use the auxiliary verb did, emphasizing the general action of sleepwalking.

You wouldn't know if you sleepwalk.

You wouldn't know if you did [sleepwalk].

Had is the past perfect, and requires the past participle sleepwalked. If Speaker A was referring to a past event of sleepwalking rather than sleepwalking itself, this would be better.

I didn't sleepwalk.

You wouldn't know if you had [sleepwalked].

You should use the auxiliary verb did, emphasizing the general action of sleepwalking.

You wouldn't know if you sleepwalk.

You wouldn't know if you did [sleepwalk].

Had is the past perfect, and requires the past participle sleepwalked. If Speaker A was referring to a past event of sleepwalking rather than sleepwalking itself, this would be better.

I didn't sleepwalk.

You wouldn't know if you had [sleepwalked].

Source Link
Kman3
  • 2.8k
  • 11
  • 14

You must use the auxiliary verb did, emphasizing the general action of sleepwalking.

You wouldn't know if you sleepwalk.

You wouldn't know if you did [sleepwalk].

Had is the past perfect, and requires the past participle sleepwalked. If Speaker A was referring to a past event of sleepwalking rather than sleepwalking itself, this would be better.

I didn't sleepwalk.

You wouldn't know if you had [sleepwalked].