Timeline for "see yourself" vs. "see for yourself"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 25, 2018 at 11:31 | vote | accept | Dmytro O'Hope | ||
Apr 7, 2018 at 14:11 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Mar 8, 2018 at 0:35 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Feb 4, 2018 at 4:21 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 27, 2017 at 7:18 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 20, 2017 at 12:24 | vote | accept | Dmytro O'Hope | ||
Sep 20, 2017 at 12:24 | |||||
Sep 20, 2017 at 5:54 | history | edited | user3169 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting
|
Sep 20, 2017 at 5:37 | answer | added | M.I | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 20, 2017 at 5:10 | comment | added | user30379 | If for was removed, it might come off as the speaker requesting that the listener take a look at themselves, instead of looking at sth. else; "..see yourself". Also, this phrase is the second half of, "Don't take my word for it, see for yourself." | |
Sep 20, 2017 at 4:41 | history | asked | Dmytro O'Hope | CC BY-SA 3.0 |