Timeline for "the set of elements >whose each< pair is ... " - Is this acceptable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
27 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://ell.stackexchange.com/ with https://ell.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Sep 19, 2015 at 23:50 | history | edited | StoneyB on hiatus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
S Apr 23, 2015 at 4:07 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Apr 23, 2015 at 4:07 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Apr 22, 2015 at 12:01 | history | edited | FumbleFingers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 683 characters in body
|
Apr 20, 2015 at 7:05 | answer | added | Brian Hitchcock | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 20, 2015 at 3:29 | answer | added | Araucaria - Not here any more. | timeline score: 4 | |
Apr 16, 2015 at 13:57 | answer | added | Man_From_India | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 16, 2015 at 13:05 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | @DCShannon: The OP apparently hasn't returned to ELL since posing the question. Not that I think the exact context makes much difference here, except that possibly one might differentiate on stylistic grounds. But the question doesn't seek style-based advice, just a straightforward ruling on whether the usage is "correct" (i.e. - valid). Some people seem to think "inanimate" whose is unacceptable, and/or that adjectival each is somehow grammatically invalid within the construction cited here. | |
Apr 16, 2015 at 12:51 | history | edited | FumbleFingers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
link to more context
|
Apr 15, 2015 at 21:23 | answer | added | DCShannon | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 15, 2015 at 21:18 | comment | added | DCShannon | Please add your link to Quora to the question. Comments may be deleted at any time, and the question isn't really understandable without the context. | |
Apr 15, 2015 at 21:00 | answer | added | R Mac | timeline score: -1 | |
S Apr 15, 2015 at 2:32 | history | bounty started | FumbleFingers | ||
S Apr 15, 2015 at 2:32 | history | notice added | FumbleFingers | Draw attention | |
Feb 15, 2013 at 13:11 | comment | added | Jon Hanna | "The set whose each pair of elements...". | |
Feb 14, 2013 at 13:41 | comment | added | Alex Grilo | I was trying to ask this question in Quora: quora.com/Languages/Which-multiple-false-friends-are-there and the phrase I would like to write is " I would like to know sets of at least 3 words, whose each pair of words are false friends" | |
Feb 13, 2013 at 17:45 | answer | added | FumbleFingers | timeline score: 9 | |
Feb 13, 2013 at 4:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackEnglishLL/status/301545525637951488 | ||
Feb 13, 2013 at 3:55 | comment | added | Jim | I think we need a bit more of the sentence. It's not clear, at least to me, what is is you are really trying to convey here so I'm not sure if something like, "The set of element pairs such that each pair is ..." makes sense yet. I have a feeling you can get rid of the possessive altogether but until we have the whole sentence I can't be sure. | |
S Feb 13, 2013 at 3:26 | history | suggested | user114 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Feb 13, 2013 at 3:07 | comment | added | Mistu4u |
I think whose is more appropriate in case of person, not necessarily, but in most of the cases.
|
|
Feb 13, 2013 at 2:31 | answer | added | mcalex | timeline score: 7 | |
Feb 13, 2013 at 2:29 | review | First posts | |||
Feb 13, 2013 at 3:24 | |||||
Feb 13, 2013 at 2:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 13, 2013 at 3:26 | |||||
Feb 13, 2013 at 2:13 | history | asked | Alex Grilo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |