Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 5, 2017 at 17:26 comment added TimR @FumbleFingers: "Obviously you can actually say I don't believe astrology with no preposition, but that changes the meaning somewhat. " Exactly the point I was making in my answer.
Oct 5, 2017 at 17:21 comment added FumbleFingers I specifically searched for believed [in] astrology because that's more likely to occur in "formal" contexts than the first person assertion. Obviously you can actually say I don't believe astrology with no preposition, but that changes the meaning somewhat. Effectively, to I don't believe the claims astrologers make, whereas the more common in version has more the sense of I don't believe that astrology is based on truth (that it "exists" as a reliable source of truth). One might make a similar distinction in I don't believe [in] God.
Oct 5, 2017 at 17:12 comment added TimR @FumbleFingers:I don't think we can rely on ngram here inasmuch as "I don't believe astrology" is a colloquialism not likely to finds its way into print. I don't doubt that "believe in" occurs far more often. And I said "in some ways it is like a statement", not that it was a statement. I'm merely attempting to explain the usage. I do believe in astrology. You shouldn't go outdoors next week.
Oct 5, 2017 at 17:07 comment added FumbleFingers Per this NGram, to believe astrology is vanishingly rare compared to to believe in astrology. That's because astrology is a source of knowledge and/or entity whose "existence" may be doubted, rather than an actual statement (whose veracity may be open to question).
Oct 5, 2017 at 16:59 comment added TimR What sentence are you speaking of? There are several in your question.
Oct 5, 2017 at 16:59 history edited TimR CC BY-SA 3.0
added 310 characters in body
Oct 5, 2017 at 16:58 comment added subhajit dalal So can I use both of them in the sentence?
Oct 5, 2017 at 16:56 history answered TimR CC BY-SA 3.0