Timeline for 'Are' vs. 'Have been' difference in meaning
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Oct 18, 2016 at 22:41 | history | edited | ColleenV |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 17, 2013 at 17:43 | comment | added | Jay | Except that neither "till" nor "until" makes sense in context, as both words indicate that some event will not happen before this other event occurs, but the beginning of the sentence indicates that the first event has already occurred. The writer may have meant "We will NOT be able ... until", or maybe "We were able ... since". | |
| Dec 17, 2013 at 16:57 | history | edited | Martha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Tried to fix title
|
| Dec 17, 2013 at 13:24 | comment | added | hunter | @J.R. I disagree. The only thing I would not use in formal writing is 'til. see here: english.stackexchange.com/questions/6989/… | |
| Dec 17, 2013 at 10:46 | comment | added | J.R.♦ | As an aside: While the use of till would be okay conversationally, I would recommend using until in more formal writing. | |
| Dec 17, 2013 at 10:05 | answer | added | Damkerng T. | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 17, 2013 at 9:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 17, 2013 at 16:57 | |||||
| Dec 17, 2013 at 9:45 | history | edited | J.R.♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
quote boxes, helped the sentences make more sense, took out the unnecessary "he said" part.
|
| Dec 17, 2013 at 9:35 | history | asked | sanket | CC BY-SA 3.0 |