Timeline for Which one can I use instead of the word ''proven''
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2017 at 1:55 | answer | added | Lê Gia Lễ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 21:19 | answer | added | BobRodes | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 20:42 | answer | added | Jay | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 17:00 | comment | added | StoneyB on hiatus | @Cardinal You find this occasionally in bureaucratic and scientific use, but it is rare and jarring: see this Google Ngram. Bureaucratic and scientific texts are not notable for clarity or idiomaticity. | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 16:49 | comment | added | Cardinal | @StoneyB Thanks stoney for the correction. You know I checked google books and thought it's correct. I learner something new. Thanks. | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 15:56 | comment | added | StoneyB on hiatus | @Cardinal identify doesn't take infinitival complements -- we say "identified as the cause of the disease" | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 15:41 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 5, 2017 at 16:11 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2017 at 15:40 | comment | added | Cardinal | I would suggest, to identify; (was identified to be) | |
| Dec 5, 2017 at 15:38 | history | asked | Nadeen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |