Timeline for Capable of being proven or proved?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2017 at 20:52 | answer | added | Michael Login | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 18:11 | answer | added | rjpond | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 17:58 | comment | added | Sara | @Lambie, You're totally right, and your suggestion is much better. I don't know what forced this construction into my memory and writing. Perhaps, I once read it in a legal text or something. But I'm not sure. | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 17:55 | comment | added | Lambie | Sure, but it's longer. | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 17:52 | answer | added | TimR | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 17:51 | comment | added | Michael Rybkin | Why not just say that can actually be proved? | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 17:49 | comment | added | Lambie | Usually, a person is capable of this or that. Misconduct is not "capable" of anything. Wouldn't you agree? I would express it thus: Unless the psych. trauma the man experienced resulted directly from provable misconduct [etc.] | |
| Dec 10, 2017 at 17:32 | history | asked | Sara | CC BY-SA 3.0 |