Timeline for "I cleaned the carpet for 3 hours" - simple past tense vs present perfect
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 27 at 9:04 | comment | added | Stuart F | Note that "I cleaned the carpet for 3 hours" says nothing about whether the carpet is clean, or how long it takes to clean the carpet; it just means you spent 3 hours cleaning some part of it, maybe but not necessarily all of it. It doesn't imply completion. | |
Nov 27 at 2:38 | answer | added | English with Vennila | timeline score: 0 | |
Jun 24, 2021 at 4:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 23, 2021 at 1:12 | answer | added | gotube♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
S May 22, 2021 at 20:57 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting, more useful title, more useful tags
|
May 22, 2021 at 17:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 22, 2021 at 20:57 | |||||
May 22, 2021 at 17:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 18, 2021 at 3:08 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 14, 2020 at 22:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 10, 2020 at 2:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 8, 2020 at 8:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 7, 2019 at 14:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 1, 2019 at 11:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 29, 2018 at 2:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 27, 2018 at 2:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Oct 27, 2018 at 21:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 12, 2018 at 23:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Aug 10, 2018 at 11:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 11, 2018 at 8:46 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 3, 2018 at 23:10 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 4, 2018 at 1:32 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 26, 2018 at 20:49 | comment | added | WS2 | Not at all. One can say "I lived in New York for twenty years". Provided you have ceased living in New York it is alright to continue using the simple past. However if you still live in New York then you must use the perfect tense. "I have lived in New York for....". In this context it is the choice of tense which indicates to the listener whether it is an activity which has ceased. | |
Jan 26, 2018 at 20:23 | comment | added | Lambie | The use of for has zero to do with PT versus PP. | |
Jan 26, 2018 at 19:28 | history | asked | ullas84 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |