Timeline for "All you left with is nothing" vs "All you are left with is nothing"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2014 at 21:17 | answer | added | Panzercrisis | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 12:41 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 16, 2014 at 12:48 | |||||
| Jan 16, 2014 at 12:37 | answer | added | Dan Blows | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 12:35 | history | edited | theslobberymonster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 16, 2014 at 12:34 | answer | added | nxx | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 12:31 | comment | added | Andrew Leach | Would you like to proof-read the question title? | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 12:27 | comment | added | oerkelens | They mean something different but I'd say they are both correct. The first one means that you are no longer were you used to be (you left), and when you vacated that place, you took nothing with you. The second one means that at this moment you have nothing. | |
| Jan 16, 2014 at 12:25 | history | asked | theslobberymonster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |