Timeline for Use of the word "understanding"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2014 at 7:28 | answer | added | user74345 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:02 | vote | accept | user63598 | ||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:02 | vote | accept | user63598 | ||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:02 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:02 | vote | accept | user63598 | ||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:02 | |||||
| Jan 28, 2014 at 22:30 | answer | added | amateur | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 28, 2014 at 22:11 | answer | added | rogermue | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 28, 2014 at 18:58 | vote | accept | user63598 | ||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 10:02 | |||||
| Jan 28, 2014 at 18:55 | answer | added | StoneyB on hiatus | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 28, 2014 at 18:39 | history | edited | user63598 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 28, 2014 at 18:27 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 29, 2014 at 13:57 | |||||
| Jan 28, 2014 at 18:26 | comment | added | Tyler James Young | For starters, only one of these sentences has closing punctuation, but it is also the one that doesn't begin with a capital letter. One of them sounds a little awkward because it uses present continuous tense with "understanding" where most people would default to simple present, but it isn't grammatically incorrect. One of them uses commas in a way I wouldn't, etc., etc. | |
| Jan 28, 2014 at 18:25 | comment | added | Tyler James Young | Well, in a way they are all wrong, and in another way they are all fine. That's why it would help to know the context, the nonexistence of which I find very difficult to believe. | |
| Jan 28, 2014 at 18:21 | comment | added | user63598 | There is no context about the question. I can't find the mistake in any of these sentences. For me, all of them are correct. I would like to know which one is wrong. | |
| Jan 28, 2014 at 18:18 | comment | added | Tyler James Young | Which ones look right to you? Do multiple options seem incorrect? Is there a part of the instructional section covered by this test that might apply to this question? It would help a lot to know more specifically about the exact point at which this confuses you and the subject matter it is designed to evaluate. | |
| Jan 28, 2014 at 18:08 | history | asked | user63598 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |