Timeline for "Under the name of" OR "in the name of"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2018 at 17:11 | comment | added | ColleenV | It may not have been clear because of the formatting problems, but the question is about asking whether paneer is available, not explaining that paneer is available. The simplest way to ask is "Do you have any paneer cheese?" | |
| Oct 3, 2018 at 16:39 | history | migrated | from english.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Sep 22, 2018 at 14:58 | comment | added | Colin Fine | My point was that under the name of is in no way limited to a person. | |
| Sep 22, 2018 at 14:47 | comment | added | Jason Bassford | @ColinFine I agree. Under the name of is always fine. (I always do go under my own name . . .) It doesn't mean that you are impersonating somebody—just that that's the name you're using, for whatever reason. | |
| Sep 22, 2018 at 13:53 | comment | added | Colin Fine | I agree that in the name of means something different, but I see nothing wrong with using under the name of in this case. | |
| Sep 22, 2018 at 13:33 | history | answered | VTH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |