Timeline for Why not ‘mark’ instead of ‘marked’?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2021 at 10:44 | vote | accept | Y. zeng | ||
| Apr 6, 2019 at 23:50 | comment | added | Y. zeng | @AntonSherwood Okay, now I know I was wrong before. | |
| Apr 6, 2019 at 23:46 | comment | added | Y. zeng | @AntonSherwood Yes. | |
| Apr 6, 2019 at 23:44 | comment | added | Anton Sherwood | I don't understand the question. Why should the objectvity of the thing affect the form of the verb? | |
| Apr 6, 2019 at 23:43 | comment | added | Anton Sherwood | The ISBN appears to belong to a Chinese book of English vocabulary exercises, is that right? If so, more context is unlikely! | |
| Apr 5, 2019 at 20:52 | comment | added | user3395 | What do you mean by "objective thing"? The success of the battle can be replaced by it, and you can't say it mark – it's always it marks (in the present). | |
| Apr 5, 2019 at 16:43 | comment | added | J.R.♦ | Don’t tell me, tell the community | |
| Apr 5, 2019 at 14:32 | comment | added | Y. zeng | @J.R. Page 337, last line, ISBN: 9787560056326 | |
| Apr 5, 2019 at 14:21 | answer | added | Lambie | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 5, 2019 at 14:20 | comment | added | J.R.♦ | Can you tell us where this sentence came from? (See Why you should cite your source on meta.) | |
| Apr 5, 2019 at 14:19 | history | edited | J.R.♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
shortened title; used quote box
|
| Apr 5, 2019 at 13:59 | history | asked | Y. zeng | CC BY-SA 4.0 |