Timeline for What is omitted between "than" and "would be"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 20, 2019 at 15:56 | vote | accept | Hua | ||
Apr 20, 2019 at 14:00 | history | edited | user3395 |
edited tags
|
|
Apr 18, 2019 at 11:14 | history | edited | Hua | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 154 characters in body
|
Apr 18, 2019 at 11:09 | history | edited | Hua | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 154 characters in body
|
Apr 18, 2019 at 10:05 | comment | added | Hua | @FumbleFingers But I think than is a conjunction here. There must be a subject before would be possible. | |
Apr 17, 2019 at 18:19 | history | edited | Jasper |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
Apr 17, 2019 at 17:36 | history | edited | J.R.♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
shortened title
|
Apr 17, 2019 at 17:32 | answer | added | Jason Bassford | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 17, 2019 at 15:27 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | It would be perfectly okay to have just written This strategy tends to result in higher efficiency than that one. Where nobody could say for sure exactly what text is "missing" after than. The writer might have originally included the words is possible, would be possible, can be achieved,... or any number of alternatives, before deciding he didn't need anything there at all, so he deleted that text. Or he may never have felt the need to imagine using any additional text at all. | |
Apr 17, 2019 at 15:18 | answer | added | SamBC | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 17, 2019 at 15:05 | history | asked | Hua | CC BY-SA 4.0 |