Skip to main content

Timeline for Passive voice on a song´s lyrics

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 24, 2019 at 5:17 history edited David Siegel CC BY-SA 4.0
not wrong
May 24, 2019 at 5:15 comment added David Siegel @ Jason Bassford No there is no violation here.and I didn't intend to imply that there was one. Merely that questions about the grammer of song lyrics are a bit dubious, because one cannot safely assume that they are correct, or good examples. I have edited my answer to try to make this clear.
May 24, 2019 at 2:53 comment added Jason Bassford @DavidSiegel You discussed the sentence, passive constructions, and then said that "songwriters will freely violate grammatical rules." What I'm saying is that even if it is passive, that is not a violation of grammar rules.
May 23, 2019 at 23:49 comment added David Siegel @Audryplier Hmm on a second look, this might be a passive construction, with the active form being "the surprise bound us". If so, it only goes to demonstrate that in some cases passive constructions are superior.
May 23, 2019 at 23:42 comment added Audryplier But wouldnt it be "We were bound by the surprise"? And if Im not wrong (at least following the example I looked) it would be passive like
May 23, 2019 at 23:29 comment added David Siegel @Jason Bassford neither the questioner nor I said that there was anything wrong with using the passive voice. One might want to identify when it is being used without wanting to avoid it as an error. A recent answer of mine (ell.stackexchange.com/questions/211818) gives my views on the use of the passive voice rather fully.
May 23, 2019 at 23:25 comment added Jason Bassford Plus there's nothing wrong with the passive voice in the first place. Even if this were such an example, it wouldn't be violating anything.
May 23, 2019 at 23:13 history answered David Siegel CC BY-SA 4.0