2 added 17 characters in body
source | link

There are two sentences.I am just a beginner in English and want to know why is "were" used in the first sentence:

The least proportion of men werewere detained.

The number of men in the party waswas high.

Well, I am just a beginner in english and want to know why is were used in the first sentence. Well, numberNumber (in sentence 1) and proportion (in sentence 2) both are singular. So why are we using were"were" in the first sentence. but was is used in the second?

There are two sentences.

The least proportion of men were detained.

The number of men in the party was high.

Well, I am just a beginner in english and want to know why is were used in the first sentence. Well, number(in sentence 1) and proportion (in sentence 2) both are singular. So why are we using were in the first sentence.

I am just a beginner in English and want to know why is "were" used in the first sentence:

The least proportion of men were detained.

The number of men in the party was high.

Number (in sentence 1) and proportion (in sentence 2) both are singular. So why are we using "were" in the first sentence but was is used in the second?

1
source | link

Confusing example of usage of was/were

There are two sentences.

The least proportion of men were detained.

The number of men in the party was high.

Well, I am just a beginner in english and want to know why is were used in the first sentence. Well, number(in sentence 1) and proportion (in sentence 2) both are singular. So why are we using were in the first sentence.