Timeline for "I came right back AT her door" or "I came right back TO her door"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2020 at 7:34 | comment | added | Russell McMahon | @Peter-ReinstateMonica If you take a tiny moment to think it through then you are doing the OP an immense disservice. Risking misleading querants (what a lovely euphonic word) is a fairly major "be nice" fail. || Deletion, in lieu of initial decency, suggested. | |
| Jan 9, 2020 at 2:27 | answer | added | Alexei Levenkov | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 8, 2020 at 22:11 | answer | added | Dr Love | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 8, 2020 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackEnglishLL/status/1215015488360714247 | ||
| Jan 8, 2020 at 19:13 | answer | added | Ross Presser | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 8, 2020 at 18:59 | answer | added | amalloy | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 8, 2020 at 15:02 | comment | added | TylerH | It depends on if you're talking about arriving at a location, or rather describing an action. If you're trying to physically attack/break down her door, then "at" would be correct (e.g. "he came at me with a knife" implies an attack), though "I came at <something/someone else>" is awkward and also risks a double entendre. Usually you use "came at" when you are not the subject. | |
| Jan 8, 2020 at 14:31 | answer | added | Andy C | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 8, 2020 at 14:24 | vote | accept | Sigma | ||
| Jan 8, 2020 at 14:23 | vote | accept | Sigma | ||
| Jan 8, 2020 at 14:24 | |||||
| Jan 8, 2020 at 11:12 | answer | added | MT0 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 7, 2020 at 23:50 | answer | added | Nimphious | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 7, 2020 at 22:04 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jan 7, 2020 at 14:16 | answer | added | Chris Mack | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jan 7, 2020 at 14:13 | answer | added | Noaman Ali | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 7, 2020 at 14:00 | history | asked | Sigma | CC BY-SA 4.0 |