Timeline for It is possible to use "to get" instead of "to be" in passive voice?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2020 at 17:42 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Feb 22, 2020 at 16:53 | history | edited | Eddie Kal |
edited tags
|
|
| S Feb 22, 2020 at 15:11 | history | suggested | user31782 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Made it look better. . . . . . . . . . . dd . d.d.d . d.d.
|
| Feb 22, 2020 at 15:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 22, 2020 at 15:11 | |||||
| Feb 22, 2020 at 15:10 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 22, 2020 at 15:09 | answer | added | lee | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 22, 2020 at 15:06 | answer | added | L. Bock | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 22, 2020 at 11:35 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 22, 2020 at 16:53 | |||||
| Feb 22, 2020 at 11:09 | comment | added | BillJ | Yes; get-passives are an informal alternant to be-passives. "My car got stolen" is okay. But "We quickly got dressed" is an adjectival passive, not a verbal one, | |
| Feb 22, 2020 at 9:40 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 22, 2020 at 11:19 | |||||
| Feb 22, 2020 at 9:38 | history | asked | user109270 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |