Timeline for relative pronoun + to. introducing a relatve clause?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 3, 2020 at 6:45 | vote | accept | briannjs | ||
Apr 30, 2020 at 14:37 | history | edited | Nick2253 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Apr 30, 2020 at 14:37 | comment | added | Nick2253 | @BillJ Correct. I've edited the answer to hopefully be more clear. I was trying to capture the verb, and muddled the wording through my rewrites. | |
Apr 30, 2020 at 14:37 | comment | added | BillJ | @briannjs the verb is the infinitival "build". Like most non-finite clauses, it has no overt subject, though we understand it as some arbitrary person(s). What is so confusing about that? | |
Apr 30, 2020 at 14:34 | history | edited | Nick2253 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
Apr 30, 2020 at 14:19 | comment | added | briannjs | like from (1), you can meet current staff and students. is a clause because it has a subject "you" and a main verb "can meet" . | |
Apr 30, 2020 at 14:16 | comment | added | briannjs | if it is a clause, it should have a subject and a verb, that is , excluding to-infinitive, that's why I am not certain as to saying that it is not introducing a clause | |
Apr 30, 2020 at 14:14 | comment | added | BillJ | Eh? The relative clause in 2. is "on which to build". | |
Apr 30, 2020 at 14:06 | history | answered | Nick2253 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |