Timeline for Why is using only one "a" enough in this sentence?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 6, 2014 at 23:55 | comment | added | jimsug | I suppose I should point out that DPs, as well as NPs, nominal groups, etc, are all just hypothetical - there is literally no way to prove that they exist as entities, beyond their usage as a mediating language in explaining the realisations of lexicogrammar in discourse. | |
Jun 6, 2014 at 21:00 | comment | added | user230 | *cries* Until this day, innocent ELL had not been exposed to the DP hypothesis. Oh, for happier days now gone! | |
Jun 6, 2014 at 13:55 | history | answered | jimsug | CC BY-SA 3.0 |