Timeline for How do I understand (In Which) in the beginning of sentences?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 27, 2020 at 17:03 | comment | added | Rasha | Thank you for taking the time to further explain this. and to @Jason for adding more information. I wish both of you a good day. | |
Jun 26, 2020 at 14:23 | comment | added | Jason Bassford | @GaryBotnovcan No, it was meant for you (and for anybody reading the answer). You provided a clear example of using a sentence fragment in context, and I was adding commentary to it. You didn't mention that it was a sentence fragment. But sentence fragments can be stylistically acceptable in cases like this, despite them often being unacceptable when there isn't such context. | |
Jun 26, 2020 at 14:18 | comment | added | Gary Botnovcan | Did you mean to leave that comment on the body of the OP, @Jason? My answer doesn't describe anything as a sentence. The label I applied is "coherent noun phrase". | |
Jun 26, 2020 at 14:09 | comment | added | Jason Bassford | Technically, it's a sentence fragment. (Discounting the use of elision.) But that's fine in context—just not as a standalone sentence. | |
Jun 26, 2020 at 10:52 | comment | added | Gary Botnovcan | The modificand is simply the thing receiving modification. In "the thing to which each relates", the relative clause "to which each relates" is a modifier, and "the thing" is its modificand. In "a blue sky", "sky" is the modificand of "blue". | |
Jun 26, 2020 at 6:57 | comment | added | Rasha | I LOVE the way you wrote this answer. All clear now. I never thought in these sentences in relation to (Where) they are written! I will search more about modificands for this is the first time I come by this term. Thank you so much. | |
Jun 26, 2020 at 6:46 | vote | accept | Rasha | ||
Jun 26, 2020 at 3:52 | history | answered | Gary Botnovcan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |