2 added 167 characters in body
source | link

"two values are the same only if they have the same value" sounds circular because the definition doesn't really give us new information. It just refers to itself. -- "What makes two values the same?", you might wonder. And the given explanation is: when "they have the same value." Oh, great! What else the reason could be!

A "circular" dialog in this sense might go like this:

"What is 1 + 1?"
"2."
"Why?"
"Because 1 + 1 = 2."
"That's right, but why 2 is 1 + 1?"
"Because 2 = 1 + 1."

This is circular because it doesn't go anywhere. It's like we got stuck in a loop.


Here is how Macmillan Dictionary defines circular (for this sense):

 2. a circular argument or theory does not mean anything because it consists of a series of causes and effects that lead you back to the original cause

"two values are the same only if they have the same value" sounds circular because the definition doesn't really give us new information. It just refers to itself.

A "circular" dialog in this sense might go like this:

"What is 1 + 1?"
"2."
"Why?"
"Because 1 + 1 = 2."
"That's right, but why 2 is 1 + 1?"
"Because 2 = 1 + 1."

This is circular because it doesn't go anywhere. It's like we got stuck in a loop.


Here is how Macmillan Dictionary defines circular (for this sense):

 2. a circular argument or theory does not mean anything because it consists of a series of causes and effects that lead you back to the original cause

"two values are the same only if they have the same value" sounds circular because the definition doesn't really give us new information. It just refers to itself. -- "What makes two values the same?", you might wonder. And the given explanation is: when "they have the same value." Oh, great! What else the reason could be!

A "circular" dialog in this sense might go like this:

"What is 1 + 1?"
"2."
"Why?"
"Because 1 + 1 = 2."
"That's right, but why 2 is 1 + 1?"
"Because 2 = 1 + 1."

This is circular because it doesn't go anywhere. It's like we got stuck in a loop.


Here is how Macmillan Dictionary defines circular (for this sense):

 2. a circular argument or theory does not mean anything because it consists of a series of causes and effects that lead you back to the original cause

1
source | link

"two values are the same only if they have the same value" sounds circular because the definition doesn't really give us new information. It just refers to itself.

A "circular" dialog in this sense might go like this:

"What is 1 + 1?"
"2."
"Why?"
"Because 1 + 1 = 2."
"That's right, but why 2 is 1 + 1?"
"Because 2 = 1 + 1."

This is circular because it doesn't go anywhere. It's like we got stuck in a loop.


Here is how Macmillan Dictionary defines circular (for this sense):

 2. a circular argument or theory does not mean anything because it consists of a series of causes and effects that lead you back to the original cause