Timeline for Question about the word "distance" in this context of driving
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2014 at 22:52 | history | edited | Jasper | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added legal tag
|
| Jul 14, 2014 at 22:15 | answer | added | Sydney | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 21:40 | vote | accept | user5036 | ||
| Jul 14, 2014 at 16:08 | comment | added | Hellion | Logically speaking, you can't pass a bicycle when you're 3 feet behind them; you'd run over them instead of passing them. Similarly, you can't pass them when you're 3 feet in front of them, because you're already past them. Therefore, 3 feet to the side is the only reasonable way to interpret the statement. | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 15:42 | answer | added | user3169 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 12:34 | comment | added | Sydney | Agree - 3 feet at the side. Coming within 3 feet behind a cyclist is Very Bad Driving, whether the driver is passing or (especially) not passing the cyclist. | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 7:22 | comment | added | Maulik V | When you pass a vehicle having certain distance, it's the distance you maintain with it from the side. | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 7:12 | history | asked | user5036 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |