Timeline for When to pronounce ‹s› as /z/ in the middle of words?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 8, 2015 at 21:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Dec 8, 2015 at 21:13 | |||||
Oct 20, 2015 at 10:29 | history | edited | hunter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
thought of another exception
|
Jul 29, 2014 at 19:52 | comment | added | user230 | The convention is to use angle brackets for graphemes, square brackets for phones, and forward slashes for phonemes. | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 11:33 | comment | added | Nico | Thanks for the link. Now, I realise what syllabic consonant means. | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 11:31 | comment | added | hunter | ah I did not even think of those examples (chestnut, gristly)... it's too much! thanks. | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 11:30 | comment | added | hunter | this article is better: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 11:30 | comment | added | Nico | More examples: in chestnut it is possible to drop the "t", because is preceded by an "s" and followed by "n". In "listen", the "t" is preceded by an "s" and followed by an "en". Similarly, in "gristly", the "t" is preceded by an "s" and followed by "li". | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 11:28 | comment | added | hunter | yes. the nucleus of the syllable in abstention is /$\epsilon$/ and not the n. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllabic_consonant | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 10:51 | comment | added | Nico | I think I don't understand what you mean by syllabic /n/ or /l/. Does the condition syllabic /n/ exclude "abstention"? | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 10:45 | comment | added | hunter | yes, [st] prononuced /s/ is exactly when the next syllable is syllabic /n/ or syllabic /l/; this is what was already written above and is consistent with all your data (except Leicester -- place names are hopeless! I was going to add a bunch more place names to the "exceptions" rule and then gave up.) | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 10:43 | comment | added | Nico | +1 for thoroughness. The rule for "st", though, feels more like an exception than a rule, e.g.: "paste", "trust", "abstention", "assist", "assisted", "blustering"... I found "christendom", "chastened", "fasten" are like "listen". Another exception is Leicester... I think this is a tough one to describe! | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 10:24 | comment | added | hunter | as to your other question, orthographic [c] always represents an unvoiced consonant (exception: czar, I'm sure there are others if we allow relatively recent borrowings from Slavic languages). Whether that consonant is /s/, /k/, or /ʃ/ will depend on the next letter: if it is written [a, o, u] the c is /k/; if it is written [e, i, y] the c is /s/, except that as usual /sj/ assimilates to /ʃ/; so, cell, call, ocean. | |
Jul 29, 2014 at 10:06 | history | answered | hunter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |