Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 21, 2022 at 15:27 vote accept UNKNOWN
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:56 comment added Lambie Yes, and poor legalese. In contracts, etc., they sometimes do leave out the articles. bring out=emphasize.
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:42 vote accept UNKNOWN
Apr 20, 2022 at 16:54
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:37 answer added PPH timeline score: 0
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:26 comment added stangdon I don't think there's anything wrong with the writing, it's just in "legalese" - they're using "Auditor" as though it were a proper name.
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:25 history edited stangdon CC BY-SA 4.0
formatting
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:21 comment added James K But if you're not certain, you need to speak to whoever wrote that in the first place, as they haven't expressed themselves clearly in idiomatic English.
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:20 history edited James K CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:20 comment added James K That source is not public. This is not written in good English. In particular the use and repetition of a proper noun "Auditor" is very strange. I I would assume that the auditor should do both (1) and (2). Present both contradictory facts and state that he is unable to find further evidence.
S Apr 20, 2022 at 15:17 history edited UNKNOWN CC BY-SA 4.0
improved phrasing and structure
S Apr 20, 2022 at 15:17 history suggested Joachim CC BY-SA 4.0
improved phrasing and structure
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:03 comment added Joachim What is the source of that text?
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:03 review Suggested edits
S Apr 20, 2022 at 15:17
S Apr 20, 2022 at 15:00 review First questions
Apr 20, 2022 at 15:03
S Apr 20, 2022 at 15:00 history asked UNKNOWN CC BY-SA 4.0