Timeline for Unbreakable reasoning
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2022 at 19:26 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 19, 2022 at 3:03 | |||||
| Dec 4, 2022 at 18:41 | answer | added | Lambie | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 4, 2022 at 18:39 | comment | added | Lambie | No, it is not idiomatic and sounds like the person speaks another language. | |
| Dec 4, 2022 at 18:10 | answer | added | William Engels | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 4, 2022 at 18:09 | answer | added | Jack O'Flaherty | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 4, 2022 at 18:05 | comment | added | dragon | Edited. Just consider the question with "unbreakable reasoning". | |
| Dec 4, 2022 at 18:04 | history | edited | dragon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 66 characters in body
|
| Dec 4, 2022 at 17:46 | comment | added | Jack O'Flaherty | Recognizing that unbreakable doesn't apply to hypotheses, since they aren't proven yet, and that theorems and postulates are assumed things, what about proofs? For that, the term unassailable, incontestable, or a synonym, might apply. | |
| Dec 4, 2022 at 17:18 | comment | added | gotube♦ | How can a hypothesis be unbreakable? The purpose of a hypothesis is to discover if it's breakable. If it's unbreakable, then it's a fact, or a theorem or a tautology or similar. Are you rather asking for strongly positive words to describe a hypothesis? | |
| Dec 4, 2022 at 15:27 | history | edited | dragon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Dec 4, 2022 at 15:26 | history | edited | dragon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Dec 4, 2022 at 15:25 | history | edited | dragon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Dec 4, 2022 at 15:25 | history | edited | dragon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| S Dec 4, 2022 at 15:24 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 4, 2022 at 16:35 | |||||
| S Dec 4, 2022 at 15:24 | history | asked | dragon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |