3 deleted 8 characters in body
source | link

This sentence feels cluttered and hard to read. Allow me to rephrase for clarity.

The real reason nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in Negroes: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

The real reason nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in Negroes: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

When you take out the cluttered "that" and "their" it simplifies analysis. Remember that adjective and appositive clauses give extra unnecessary information. Lets test by taking this out.

The real reason: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

The real reason: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

Taken out of context, the reader doesn't know anything about the "real reason." Lets reformat again.

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and so nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and so nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

It is clear now that these are two separate ideas being connected for analysis. No unnecessary information is being given, and no adjective or appositive clause exists.

If you absolutely must use the word "reason" in the sentence (which I consider redundant),

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and this is the real reason nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and this is the real reason nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

TL;DR The sentence is cluttered with unnecessary words to connect two ideas. The content of the sentence is best stated in two independent clauses.

This sentence feels cluttered and hard to read. Allow me to rephrase for clarity.

The real reason nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in Negroes: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

When you take out the cluttered "that" and "their" it simplifies analysis. Remember that adjective and appositive clauses give extra unnecessary information. Lets test by taking this out.

The real reason: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

Taken out of context, the reader doesn't know anything about the "real reason." Lets reformat again.

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and so nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

It is clear now that these are two separate ideas being connected for analysis. No unnecessary information is being given, and no adjective or appositive clause exists.

If you absolutely must use the word "reason" in the sentence (which I consider redundant),

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and this is the real reason nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

TL;DR The sentence is cluttered with unnecessary words to connect two ideas. The content of the sentence is best stated in two independent clauses.

This sentence feels cluttered and hard to read. Allow me to rephrase for clarity.

The real reason nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in Negroes: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

When you take out the cluttered "that" and "their" it simplifies analysis. Remember that adjective and appositive clauses give extra unnecessary information. Lets test by taking this out.

The real reason: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

Taken out of context, the reader doesn't know anything about the "real reason." Lets reformat again.

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and so nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

It is clear now that these are two separate ideas being connected for analysis. No unnecessary information is being given, and no adjective or appositive clause exists.

If you absolutely must use the word "reason" in the sentence (which I consider redundant),

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and this is the real reason nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

TL;DR The sentence is cluttered with unnecessary words to connect two ideas. The content of the sentence is best stated in two independent clauses.

2 added 247 characters in body
source | link

This sentence feels cluttered and hard to read. Allow me to rephrase for clarity.

The real reason nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in Negroes: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

When you take out the cluttered "that" and "their" it simplifies analysis. Remember that adjective and appositive clauses give extra unnecessary information. Lets test by taking this out.

The real reason: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

Taken out of context, the reader doesn't know anything about the "real reason." Lets reformat again.

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and so nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

It is clear now that these are two separate ideas being connected for analysis. No unnecessary information is being given, and no adjective or appositive clause exists.

If you absolutely must use the word "reason" in the sentence (which I consider redundant),

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and this is the real reason nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

TL;DR The sentence is cluttered with unnecessary words to connect two ideas. The content of the sentence is best stated in two independent clauses.

This sentence feels cluttered and hard to read. Allow me to rephrase for clarity.

The real reason nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in Negroes: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

When you take out the cluttered "that" and "their" it simplifies analysis. Remember that adjective and appositive clauses give extra unnecessary information. Lets test by taking this out.

The real reason: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

Taken out of context, the reader doesn't know anything about the "real reason." Lets reformat again.

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and so nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

It is clear now that these are two separate ideas being connected for analysis. No unnecessary information is being given, and no adjective or appositive clause exists.

TL;DR The sentence is cluttered with unnecessary words to connect two ideas. The content of the sentence is best stated in two independent clauses.

This sentence feels cluttered and hard to read. Allow me to rephrase for clarity.

The real reason nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in Negroes: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

When you take out the cluttered "that" and "their" it simplifies analysis. Remember that adjective and appositive clauses give extra unnecessary information. Lets test by taking this out.

The real reason: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

Taken out of context, the reader doesn't know anything about the "real reason." Lets reformat again.

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and so nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

It is clear now that these are two separate ideas being connected for analysis. No unnecessary information is being given, and no adjective or appositive clause exists.

If you absolutely must use the word "reason" in the sentence (which I consider redundant),

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and this is the real reason nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

TL;DR The sentence is cluttered with unnecessary words to connect two ideas. The content of the sentence is best stated in two independent clauses.

1
source | link

This sentence feels cluttered and hard to read. Allow me to rephrase for clarity.

The real reason nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in Negroes: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

When you take out the cluttered "that" and "their" it simplifies analysis. Remember that adjective and appositive clauses give extra unnecessary information. Lets test by taking this out.

The real reason: white men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened.

Taken out of context, the reader doesn't know anything about the "real reason." Lets reformat again.

White men do not want their lives, self-image, or property threatened, and so nonviolence is considered a virtue in Negroes.

It is clear now that these are two separate ideas being connected for analysis. No unnecessary information is being given, and no adjective or appositive clause exists.

TL;DR The sentence is cluttered with unnecessary words to connect two ideas. The content of the sentence is best stated in two independent clauses.