Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 13, 2023 at 10:06 comment added FumbleFingers @gotube: We refer to article-less liver when we're thinking of turning it into pate, or cooking liver and onions. But if I refer to the heart I'm not necessarily thinking any particular person's heart - I might not even be thinking about human hearts (or even mammal hearts; fish have hearts! :) The difference is substance or "organ", not substance in general or that substance in the body of some context-specific "organism".
Jun 13, 2023 at 6:25 history edited Richard Winters CC BY-SA 4.0
Adding information to the question that the author mentioned in the comments.
Jun 10, 2023 at 17:43 comment added gotube When you use "the" it implies "the phloem of a plant". Without "the", it means phloem in general. There's almost no difference, so it only tells you whether the writer was thinking about the general concept of phloem, or was picturing a particular plant.
Jun 10, 2023 at 9:26 comment added Zheng Li @gotube Thanks. Does it mean that it is optional? Still not sure why the author, who is a native speaker, bothered to use 'the' every time in the article.
Jun 10, 2023 at 5:40 comment added gotube For what it's worth, the Wikipedia article on phloem includes "the phloem" eight times. There's no rule against it.
Jun 10, 2023 at 2:12 answer added FumbleFingers timeline score: 2
Jun 10, 2023 at 1:45 comment added Zheng Li For example: "Lignification is a key feature of the differentiation of vessels and fibers in xylem and phloem."
Jun 10, 2023 at 1:43 comment added Zheng Li As this is for generic use, I don't understand why it has 'the'. Also, in many articles, this word 'phloem' appears without 'the'. So, please help here.
Jun 10, 2023 at 1:39 comment added gotube Why do you think that mass nouns cannot have "the" before them?
S Jun 10, 2023 at 1:29 review First questions
Jun 13, 2023 at 6:25
S Jun 10, 2023 at 1:29 history asked Zheng Li CC BY-SA 4.0