Timeline for Can't understand the meaning of "emergent" in this context
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2023 at 9:22 | vote | accept | Gianni Trattore | ||
| S Jul 25, 2023 at 23:08 | history | suggested | Azor Ahai -him- | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| Jul 25, 2023 at 16:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 25, 2023 at 23:08 | |||||
| Jul 25, 2023 at 16:31 | history | edited | MarcInManhattan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Deleted "translation" tag, which didn't apply. Deleted thanks.
|
| Jul 25, 2023 at 16:27 | answer | added | MarcInManhattan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 25, 2023 at 15:05 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | Saying something is an emergent phenomenon is all the rage lately. In your context, when Peterson says the Bible is an "emergent document", he just means it's been produced by many different hands over many generations, but few if any of those "joint authors" had any idea what the eventual product would be. Don't overthink it, though. He's just riffing off the idea that something like consciousness is an "emergent phenomenon" that couldn't be predicted by just examining (biological or silicon) neural networks. | |
| S Jul 25, 2023 at 14:56 | review | First questions | |||
| Jul 26, 2023 at 9:25 | |||||
| S Jul 25, 2023 at 14:56 | history | asked | Gianni Trattore | CC BY-SA 4.0 |