Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 29, 2023 at 22:57 comment added James K What? this is a surprise? Every natural language is riddled with ambiguity. English has both sematic ambiguity (where a single word can have multiple meanings) and syntactic ambiguity (where a sentence can be parsed in different ways). It is just the same as Chinese and every other language in the way.
Aug 29, 2023 at 13:09 comment added Y. zeng @JanusBahsJacquet In Chinese, there are always such ambibuous expressions. Unexpectedly, the same is true for English.
Aug 29, 2023 at 8:40 comment added Janus Bahs Jacquet @Y.zeng It can mean both. It’s ambiguous.
Aug 29, 2023 at 4:20 comment added Y. zeng "Fly from Chicago to New York, to Mami, to Los Angeles" means "Chicago → New York → Miami → Los Angeles" or "Chicago → New York, Chicago → Miami and Chicago → Los Angeles"? @JanusBahsJacquet
Aug 28, 2023 at 20:30 comment added Janus Bahs Jacquet Regarding what the pictures show: In the actual sentence quoted in the question, there is no literal, spatial from > to, so it doesn’t make sense to distinguish between the two meanings indicated by the illustrations. But if it’s spatial, the difference is clear: “You can fly from Chicago to New York, to Miami(,) and to Los Angeles” is ambiguous: can you fly Chicago → New York → Miami → Los Angeles (first picture), or can you fly Chicago → New York, Chicago → Miami and Chicago → Los Angeles (second picture)?
Aug 28, 2023 at 15:47 comment added muru @Y.zeng or possibly "then" - for example: "The pipeline would originate in Iowa, travel through the Quad Cities, then near Peoria, then on to Decatur."
Aug 28, 2023 at 5:24 comment added James K Use "and", perhaps with while: "While baking the cookies, make tea, clean the dishes and set the table."
Aug 28, 2023 at 5:20 comment added Y. zeng So, A, B, C and D are in parallel? If express as progressive, how should we write it?
Aug 28, 2023 at 5:19 history answered James K CC BY-SA 4.0