Timeline for Is the interrogative structure "Is X to do with Y" grammatical?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2013 at 13:58 | comment | added | StoneyB on hiatus | I would have said so, too; but the British Council says otherwise. | |
| Mar 7, 2013 at 13:49 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | @StoneyB: I've always thought "got-insertion" was primarily an American habit. BrE: "What has that to do with me?"; AmE: What's Love Got to Do with It. But I guess all Anglophones are honorary Americans these days. | |
| Mar 7, 2013 at 12:10 | comment | added | StoneyB on hiatus | +1 I note, too, that what seems to be happening is that in BE is to do with is replacing got to do with. | |
| Mar 5, 2013 at 15:12 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=114 by developer User.Id=2 | |
| Mar 5, 2013 at 2:59 | history | edited | FumbleFingers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2498 characters in body
|
| Mar 5, 2013 at 0:16 | history | edited | FumbleFingers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1241 characters in body
|
| Mar 5, 2013 at 0:02 | history | answered | FumbleFingers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |