Skip to main content
English Language Learners

Return to Answer

added 5 characters in body
Source Link
user6951
user6951

Yes, it is a usage error, if by that you mean poor word choice. A better word choice might have been developed or designed.

But the article is laced with poor word choices, including "crafted" in the first paragraph, "extravagant systems and gadgets" (especially in juxtaposition with "unconscionable"), "fizzled," "job," "tainting," "fancy phones," and the repetitive use of "this newspaper."

Katy Murphy and the contributing writer have put together an article froth with poor writing.

One thing you can build is the future, includingwhich includes the next generation, so that may have influenced the writer's choice of words, given the project name.

Yes, it is a usage error, if by that you mean poor word choice. A better word choice might have been developed or designed.

But the article is laced with poor word choices, including "crafted" in the first paragraph, "extravagant systems and gadgets" (especially in juxtaposition with "unconscionable"), "fizzled," "job," "tainting," "fancy phones," and the repetitive use of "this newspaper."

Katy Murphy and the contributing writer have put together an article froth with poor writing.

One thing you can build is the future, including the next generation, so that may have influenced the writer's choice of words, given the project name.

Yes, it is a usage error, if by that you mean poor word choice. A better word choice might have been developed or designed.

But the article is laced with poor word choices, including "crafted" in the first paragraph, "extravagant systems and gadgets" (especially in juxtaposition with "unconscionable"), "fizzled," "job," "tainting," "fancy phones," and the repetitive use of "this newspaper."

Katy Murphy and the contributing writer have put together an article froth with poor writing.

One thing you can build is the future, which includes the next generation, so that may have influenced the writer's choice of words, given the project name.

Source Link
user6951
user6951

Yes, it is a usage error, if by that you mean poor word choice. A better word choice might have been developed or designed.

But the article is laced with poor word choices, including "crafted" in the first paragraph, "extravagant systems and gadgets" (especially in juxtaposition with "unconscionable"), "fizzled," "job," "tainting," "fancy phones," and the repetitive use of "this newspaper."

Katy Murphy and the contributing writer have put together an article froth with poor writing.

One thing you can build is the future, including the next generation, so that may have influenced the writer's choice of words, given the project name.