Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 16 at 20:26 comment added Joe When the guy who says, "Donald Trump got shot at" starts writing in iambic pentameter, we'll talk.
Jul 16 at 20:04 comment added TonyK @Joe: Does Shakespeare count as poor English in your estimation? Just in Hamlet's soliloquy, we have (i) "The heart-ache, and the thousand natural shocks / That Flesh is heir to"; and (ii) "And makes us rather bear those ills we have, / Than fly to others that we know not of?"
Jul 16 at 8:09 comment added aantia @Joe I direct you to Churchill's wisdom on the subject of prepositions (with which you are probably familiar, but I'll take any excuse). Personally I would take issue with the word 'got'. It's unnecessary, it adds the implication that the shooting may have been accidental or even self-inflicted, and it makes the speaker sound uneducated.
Jul 16 at 2:52 comment added Joe Or if the shade of meaning is critical to you, then, "Someone shot at Donald Trump". No need to use passive.
Jul 16 at 2:33 comment added Joe I don't propose amending it. I propose removing the "at" as the person who edited it did. As for the rule, mostly it was ignored by people who didn't pay attention in English class.
Jul 16 at 0:34 comment added TonyK @Joe: How do you propose amending "Donald Trump just got shot at" to avoid ending the sentence with a preposition? It can't be done. The rule was always ridiculous, and ignored by anybody with a feel for the English language.
Jul 15 at 21:25 answer added user8356 timeline score: 6
Jul 15 at 20:44 comment added Weather Vane @RussellBorogove that information has surfaced since the initial report, which was that a bullet nicked his ear.
Jul 15 at 19:56 comment added Joe For many years, ending a sentence with a preposition was considered poor English. So #1 would be rejected. But over time as the language perpetually is dumbed down to the lowest common denominator, what used to be mark of a poor education becomes ignored, rationalized, and then accepted. Eventually we will all speak in emoticons. :-)
Jul 15 at 17:33 comment added Russell Borogove @WeatherVane Unclear, but it seems he was not shot (= hit by a bullet), but rather nicked by flying glass from the teleprompter. A quibble, but it's a question about a quibble.
Jul 14 at 21:52 comment added Weather Vane DJT was both shot and shot at. Several shots were fired, only one of which one hit Trump but others caused fatalities.
Jul 14 at 17:29 history became hot network question
Jul 14 at 16:18 answer added Lambie timeline score: 3
Jul 14 at 16:13 comment added Lambie You can shoot someone or you can shoot at someone.
Jul 14 at 15:59 history edited Mari-Lou A CC BY-SA 4.0
removed the shouting title (block capitals is considered rude and akin to shouting)
Jul 14 at 15:23 comment added Kai Burghardt This question is similar to: Shoot, Shoot At. If you believe it’s different, please edit the question, make it clear how it’s different and/or how the answers on that question are not helpful for your problem.
Jul 14 at 10:46 answer added TimR timeline score: 6
Jul 14 at 10:41 review Close votes
Jul 23 at 3:05
Jul 14 at 3:27 vote accept otakutyrant
Jul 14 at 3:11 review Low quality posts
Jul 14 at 16:09
Jul 14 at 3:00 answer added Seowjooheng Singapore timeline score: 6
Jul 14 at 2:58 answer added Mary timeline score: 28
Jul 14 at 2:46 history asked otakutyrant CC BY-SA 4.0