Timeline for 17 billions of bottles VS 17 billion of bottles
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2016 at 10:59 | comment | added | TonyK | @MaulikV: I would never say "in the year of 2011". Did you notice that most of your Google hits were from South or South-East Asia? I think this is a regional peculiarity. | |
| Jan 7, 2015 at 8:41 | history | edited | Maulik V | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2015 at 5:11 | comment | added | Maulik V | @FreeAsInBeer removed. However, I think it works same as The city of Chicago | |
| Jan 7, 2015 at 5:09 | history | edited | Maulik V | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Jan 6, 2015 at 18:32 | comment | added | FreeAsInBeer | @MaulikV As a native English speaker, "in the year of 2000" sounds really strange. It's more natural to remove "of" in this phrase. | |
| Jan 6, 2015 at 15:40 | vote | accept | Ilan | ||
| Jan 6, 2015 at 12:25 | comment | added | Maulik V | Okay I buy those words ;) @oerkelens | |
| Jan 6, 2015 at 9:24 | comment | added | oerkelens | 370 results, versus 5000 in the news category for the version without of. In the web category_ roughly 5M versus 27M results. I'm not saying it isn't used, but it looks strange to me, and according to your own source, to a lot of people. | |
| Jan 6, 2015 at 9:11 | comment | added | Maulik V | @oerkelens hey, I think it's common to write that way! | |
| Jan 6, 2015 at 9:05 | comment | added | oerkelens | +1, just a small detail: in the year of 2000 -> you removed one of, I think it is better removed here as well: in the year 2000. | |
| Jan 6, 2015 at 5:27 | history | answered | Maulik V | CC BY-SA 3.0 |