The remarkable thing about many of the medicines dismissed THEN AS 'snake oil' IS NOT SO MUCH THAT they failed to live up to the outrageous claims made for them - those that weren't harmless coloured water could be positively dangerous.
You've parsed the sentence incorrectly and, sticking with a false assumption, tried to decode a meaningless phrase. As such, your question is an XY questionan XY question; it would have been better to ask us what the whole sentence means.
Here's how you should read the sentence:
The remarkable thing
about
many of the medicines dismissed then as 'snake oil'
is not so much that
they failed to live up to the outrageous claims made for them
[but that]
those that weren't harmless coloured water could be positively dangerous.
The idiom here is:
It is not so much that X, but that Y.
It means, loosely that, although X is true, Y is more true, or more relevant, or more of whatever the context calls for.
- In this case, it's "more remarkable" that the snake oil medicines could be actively harmful, than that someone had lied about them.