Timeline for Singular they and gender neutrality
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 2, 2021 at 12:24 | answer | added | Astralbee | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 2, 2021 at 11:06 | answer | added | rjpond | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 5, 2016 at 17:59 | history | edited | Jasper | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Spelled out abbreviations. Edited tags. Corrected typo.
|
Oct 15, 2015 at 17:22 | history | edited | StoneyB on hiatus |
edited tags
|
|
Apr 17, 2015 at 20:11 | comment | added | DJMcMayhem | @tchrist I know it is, but some people think it isn't. | |
Apr 17, 2015 at 9:45 | comment | added | tchrist | @DJMcMayhem No, using they is grammatically correct. | |
Mar 22, 2015 at 0:33 | comment | added | DJMcMayhem | If you are uncomfortable with gender neutrality in English, don't worry, I am too. (Native speaker) This fable pretty accurately sums up my thoughts on trying to be politically correct. Write "he" and you are chauvinistic. Write "he/she" and you are trying too hard to be politically correct. Write "they" and your grammar is wrong. | |
Mar 21, 2015 at 18:52 | history | edited | Ben Kovitz |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 21, 2015 at 12:46 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackEnglishLL/status/579262926567116800 | ||
Mar 21, 2015 at 11:16 | answer | added | Vag | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 21, 2015 at 11:00 | comment | added | J.R.♦ | Personally, I think using one can give a sentence a "philosophical" feel – which works fine in some cases but might read awkwardly in others. Moreover, one might also avoid the gender problem by switching to the second person; e.g.: You should always be aware of your surroundings. | |
Mar 21, 2015 at 10:45 | history | edited | Bebop B. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 53 characters in body
|
Mar 21, 2015 at 10:40 | history | asked | Bebop B. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |