Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
If 'public' is a collective noun then why is notisn't 'people'?
I find that the word public is regarded as a collective noun and the subsequent verb is said to be used in singular form.
Then why is not people a collective noun though the meaning of the two words is quite same?
If 'public' is a collective noun then why is not 'people'?
I find that the word public is regarded as a collective noun and the subsequent verb is said to be used in singular form.
Then why is not people a collective noun though the meaning of the two words is quite same?
If 'public' is a collective noun then why isn't 'people'?
I find that the word public is regarded as a collective noun and the subsequent verb is said to be used in singular form.
Then why is not people a collective noun though the meaning of the two words is quite same?
I find that the word public is regarded as a collective noun and the subsequent verb is said to be used in singular form.
Then why is not people a collective noun?where though the meaning of the two wordwords is quite same.?
I find that the word public is regarded as a collective noun and the subsequent verb is said to be used in singular form.
Then why is not people a collective noun?where the meaning of the two word is quite same.
I find that the word public is regarded as a collective noun and the subsequent verb is said to be used in singular form.
Then why is not people a collective noun though the meaning of the two words is quite same?
If 'public' is a collective noun then why is not 'people'?
I find that the word public is regarded as a collective noun and the subsequent verb is said to be used in singular form.
Then why is not people a collective noun?where the meaning of the two word is quite same.
