I had a look through this post and found that a correct use was given through your example.

Essentially through is appropriate when you want to convey:

some kind of effect occurred through or via the method of some kind of cause.

The difference between through and because is that through implies that the action was required to produce the effect, where as because of only implies a reason. Compare:

• I drove the nail in to a piece of wood through careful use of a hammer.
• I covered my ears because the fire alarm was very loud.

The alternative suggestions are of varying help...

From would only be the correct construction if you were implying you collected the money as with the sheep here:

• This morning I gathered the sheep from the field.

By following or by using isn't too bad, but there's a subtle difference. Constructing a sentence using one of these forms implies that the result of the action was final rather than part of a sequence of steps.

• I reached my destination by following the signs.
• I reached my destination by using public transport.
• I reached my destination through the forest path.

I personally feel that only the third one implies that it is describing only part of how I got there, where as the other two imply that this was the only major part of the journey. In the case of your sentence, by following implies that the tips were complete instructions and that following them is all that is necessary, while through implies that the tips need to be understood and adjusted to fit the circumstances.

It is also appropriate when something is moving within something else, such as:

• I walked through the room.
• The room was lit by the sun coming through the window.

Edit: Also, because you asked Pazzo, yes I'm a native speaker. Pazzo is also correct that there should be commas around "Alex" in your sentence.

I had a look through this post and found that a correct use was given through your example.

Essentially through is appropriate when you want to convey:

some kind of effect occurred through or via the method of some kind of cause.

The difference between through and because is that through implies that the action was required to produce the effect, where as because of only implies a reason. Compare:

• I drove the nail in to a piece of wood through careful use of a hammer.
• I covered my ears because the fire alarm was very loud.

The alternative suggestions are of varying help...

From would only be the correct construction if you were implying you collected the money as with the sheep here:

• This morning I gathered the sheep from the field.

By following or by using isn't too bad, but there's a subtle difference. Constructing a sentence using one of these forms implies that the result of the action was final rather than part of a sequence of steps.

• I reached my destination by following the signs.
• I reached my destination by using public transport.
• I reached my destination through the forest path.

I personally feel that only the third one implies that it is describing only part of how I got there, where as the other two imply that this was the only major part of the journey. In the case of your sentence, by following implies that the tips were complete instructions and that following them is all that is necessary, while through implies that the tips need to be understood and adjusted to fit the circumstances.

It is also appropriate when something is moving within something else, such as:

• I walked through the room.
• The room was lit by the sun coming through the window.

Edit: Also, because you asked Pazzo, yes I'm a native speaker. Pazzo is also correct that there should be commas around "Alex" in your sentence.

Edit 2: I just noticed you asked Alex S, not Pazzo, oops.