Timeline for Use of would in english
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 17, 2015 at 20:55 | comment | added | Crazy Eyes | I think @user4084 might be confused about the fact that the events in the story took place in the past, but the sentence uses "would" as if to imply that the baby has not disappeared yet. In the context of a story or events that took place in the past, we can use "would" to mean that "it will happen later in the story." In other words, the "present" is what's currently happening in the story, not the actual present in real time. | |
Jun 18, 2015 at 19:27 | history | edited | rogermue |
I added a better tag.
|
|
Jun 18, 2015 at 8:04 | comment | added | user4084 | @Demkerng. You were right, prima facie sentence mean the same as you said. But in context is means it is repetation of police foxing. | |
Jun 18, 2015 at 7:48 | answer | added | Vlammuh | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 18, 2015 at 7:29 | comment | added | Maulik V | read... very brutal. And @DamkerngT. is right! :) | |
Jun 18, 2015 at 7:21 | comment | added | Damkerng T. | You can (and should) add what you think in your question. I could've been wrong because I didn't read the whole story (it's too long to read in a few seconds), but I assumed that the story was told in the past tense (aka narrative past), and the tenses used in the story were (or should be, if my assumption is correct) shifted to the past accordingly. | |
Jun 18, 2015 at 7:14 | comment | added | user4084 | @ Demkerng I don't thik so | |
Jun 18, 2015 at 6:49 | comment | added | Damkerng T. | It's a normal would as the past of will. | |
Jun 18, 2015 at 6:14 | history | asked | user4084 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |