Skip to main content
added 107 characters in body
Source Link

"have..[group] ..so designated" means "designate ....[group] as [undesirable]"

So it means the government officials can designate ...without any [prior] trial or open process. That is, declaring a group "undesirable" can be done secretly, without giving any reason.

It does NOT mean that the groups, or those who associate with them, won't have a "trial or open process" after they are arrested (although that might also be the case, but the article does not say that).

I hope this clears that up"Designated" is not a mere adjective, it is a verb. The (Compare "have them killed".) so the "without..." phrase is adverbial toadverb for the verb "designate", not modifyingmodifier for the noun "groups".

"have..[group] ..so designated" means "designate ....[group] as [undesirable]"

So it means the government officials can designate ...without any [prior] trial or open process. That is, declaring a group "undesirable" can be done secretly, without giving any reason.

It does NOT mean that the groups, or those who associate with them, won't have a "trial or open process" after they are arrested (although that might also be the case, but the article does not say that).

I hope this clears that up. The phrase is adverbial to the verb "designate", not modifying the noun "groups".

"have..[group] ..so designated" means "designate ....[group] as [undesirable]"

So it means the government officials can designate ...without any [prior] trial or open process. That is, declaring a group "undesirable" can be done secretly, without giving any reason.

It does NOT mean that the groups, or those who associate with them, won't have a "trial or open process" after they are arrested (although that might also be the case, but the article does not say that).

"Designated" is not a mere adjective, it is a verb. (Compare "have them killed".) so the "without..." phrase is adverb for the verb "designate", not modifier for the noun "groups".

added 107 characters in body
Source Link

It"have..[group] ..so designated" means they can"designate ....[group] as [undesirable]"

So it means the government officials can designate ...without any [prior] trial or open process. That is, declaring a group "undesirable" can be done secretly, without giving any reason.

It does NOT mean that the groups, or those who associate with them, won't have a "trial or open process" after they are arrested (although that might also be the case, but the article does not say that).

I hope this clears that up. The phrase is adverbial to the verb "designate", not modifying the noun "groups".

It means they can designate ...without any [prior] trial or open process. That is, declaring a group "undesirable" can be done secretly, without giving any reason.

It does NOT mean that the groups, or those who associate with them, won't have a "trial or open process" after they are arrested (although that might also be the case, but the article does not say that).

I hope this clears that up. The phrase is adverbial to the verb "designate", not modifying the noun "groups".

"have..[group] ..so designated" means "designate ....[group] as [undesirable]"

So it means the government officials can designate ...without any [prior] trial or open process. That is, declaring a group "undesirable" can be done secretly, without giving any reason.

It does NOT mean that the groups, or those who associate with them, won't have a "trial or open process" after they are arrested (although that might also be the case, but the article does not say that).

I hope this clears that up. The phrase is adverbial to the verb "designate", not modifying the noun "groups".

Source Link

It means they can designate ...without any [prior] trial or open process. That is, declaring a group "undesirable" can be done secretly, without giving any reason.

It does NOT mean that the groups, or those who associate with them, won't have a "trial or open process" after they are arrested (although that might also be the case, but the article does not say that).

I hope this clears that up. The phrase is adverbial to the verb "designate", not modifying the noun "groups".